Altvia vs InvestorFlow: API, MCP and investor access compared

Both are Salesforce-based LP portals sold to private equity and venture firms. This page sets the two registry entries side by side: how investors log in, whether an API or MCP server exists and for whom, what files can be exported, and what the terms say about automation.

Category: LP portalUpdated 2026-11-07Independent, not affiliated with either vendor
Independent community research. This comparison is generated from the open OpenInvestorPortal registry (CC0). It is not affiliated with, sponsored by or reviewed by Altvia or InvestorFlow. Neither entry is vendor verified yet, so treat it as a starting point and confirm details with the vendor. If something is wrong or out of date, correct the entry by pull request or email hello@openinvestorportal.com.

Side by side

Altvia ShareSecure and InvestorFlow Investor Portal compared
FieldAltvia ShareSecureInvestorFlow Investor Portal
VendorAltviaCountry: US
Vendor site
InvestorFlowCountry: US
Vendor site
CategoryLP portalLP portal
RegionsNorth AmericaNorth America, Global
Asset classesPrivate equity, Venture capital, Fund of funds, Real estatePrivate equity, Private credit, Real estate, Venture capital, Fund of funds
Web and SSOAvailableSSO: not recordedAvailableSSO: not recorded
APIUnknownUnknown
Investor-side APIUnknownFrom the registry assessmentUnknownFrom the registry assessment
MCPPartner onlyMaintainer: vendor
Endpoint: not published
Unknown
SFTPUnknownUnknown
WebhooksUnknownUnknown
Email notificationsAvailableAvailable
Export formatsNone listedNone listed
CapabilitiesDocuments, Capital calls, Distributions, Fund reports, Performance, MessagingDocuments, Capital calls, Distributions, Capital account statements, Tax documents, Fund reports, Performance, Subscriptions
StandardsNone listedNone listed
Difficulty4 / 5Web login only, exports possible4 / 5Web login only, exports possible
Automation policy and termsUnknownTerms URL not recordedProhibitedTerms
Known deployments00
VerificationUnverifiedUpdated 2026-11-07UnverifiedUpdated 2026-11-07

"Not documented" and "Unknown" mean the researchers found no public statement either way, not that the feature is missing.

Key differences

  • MCP server. Altvia: partner only (vendor-maintained). InvestorFlow: not documented.
  • Capabilities. Listed for Altvia only: Messaging; listed for InvestorFlow only: Capital account statements, Tax documents and Subscriptions.
  • Regions. Listed for InvestorFlow only: Global.
  • Asset classes. Listed for InvestorFlow only: Private credit.
  • Automation in the terms. Recorded as unknown for Altvia and prohibited for InvestorFlow.

What the entries have in common

  • Email notifications: both are recorded as available.
  • Neither entry documents an API, SFTP or webhooks.
  • Investor-side API: unknown for both, according to the assessment.
  • Difficulty: both are rated 4 of 5 (web login only, exports possible).
  • Known deployments: none documented for either yet.

Which fits which need

Neither product is right for every team. The statements below are conditional and come straight from the registry fields above.

For investors and LP operations teams

  • If your investors or your operations team need documents and data through an API, the registry records the API as not documented for either. Access for the investor itself is recorded as unknown for both.
  • If you want to reach the data from an AI assistant, the MCP server is partner only for Altvia and not documented for InvestorFlow. A vendor MCP server can still be limited to the vendor's direct customers, so read the research notes below for who may sign in.
  • If you process capital call and distribution notices from your inbox, email notifications are available for both.
  • If you load files into your own systems, the registry lists no export formats for either.
  • If you plan to automate your own login, automation in the terms is unknown for Altvia and prohibited for InvestorFlow. Where it is prohibited or unknown, ask the GP or the vendor for a sanctioned channel first.

For GPs, fund administrators and buyers

  • If you need to connect the product to your back office, both entries record API not documented, webhooks not documented and SFTP not documented.
  • If the product must carry the core LP reporting items (capital calls, distributions, capital account statements and tax documents), the structured capabilities cover capital calls and distributions for Altvia and all four for InvestorFlow.
  • If your investors are concentrated in particular markets, the regions recorded are North America for Altvia and North America and Global for InvestorFlow.
  • If you manage a specific strategy, the asset classes recorded are private equity, venture capital, fund of funds and real estate for Altvia and private equity, private credit, real estate, venture capital and fund of funds for InvestorFlow.
  • If you want to see who already runs each product, the registry has no documented deployments for either yet. Operators can add theirs to the registry.
  • If your investors will want programmatic access later, the difficulty rating is 4 of 5 for both, where 1 is a documented self-serve API an investor can use and 5 is web login only with MFA.

For a structured shortlist beyond these two products, see the guide how to choose an investor portal.

What the research says

Altvia ShareSecure

Assessment. LP portal with 2FA and email notifications. No public API. MCP for GP teams only.

Research notes. Combined data room and LP portal. No LP-side programmatic access identified.

  • Web: 2FA, encryption, dynamic watermarks. SSO not mentioned.
  • API: Salesforce-based. No public API docs.
  • MCP: Press (May 2026) reports MCP access for GP teams. Not confirmed on vendor site.
  • Email: LPs notified of capital calls, distributions and reports on posting.

Sources: altvia.com/vdr-portal/ · briefglance.com/articles/altvia-links-private-markets-to-ai-with-open-standard-bridge

InvestorFlow Investor Portal

Assessment. Web portal with configurable email notices. No public API. Terms prohibit scraping.

Research notes. Salesforce-based. Ingests data from administrators such as SS&C, Citco, Apex and CSC.

  • Web: Branded LP portal, enterprise IAM with SSO and MFA, dynamic watermarks.
  • Email: Notices via portal, email or both; LPs set preferences.
  • Terms: No robots, spiders or scraping; accounts may not be shared.

Sources: www.investorflow.com/solutions/applications/investor-services/ · www.investorflow.com/terms-of-use/

Frequently asked questions

Does Altvia or InvestorFlow have an API investors can use?

Altvia: API not documented, investor-side access unknown. InvestorFlow: API not documented, investor-side access unknown. These are registry records from public sources, so confirm current terms with the vendor.

Do Altvia and InvestorFlow offer an MCP server?

Altvia: partner only (vendor-maintained). InvestorFlow: not documented. Vendor MCP servers often serve the vendor's direct customers first, such as GP teams, rather than every investor.

How hard is it to get data out of Altvia and InvestorFlow automatically?

The registry rates Altvia 4 of 5 (web login only, exports possible) and InvestorFlow 4 of 5 (web login only, exports possible). The scale runs from 1, a documented self-serve API an investor can use, to 5, web login only with MFA.

May I automate my login to Altvia or InvestorFlow?

Altvia's position on automated access is not recorded; check the terms before automating. InvestorFlow's terms prohibit automated access, so use an API, export or delegated user the vendor offers.

Is this comparison affiliated with Altvia or InvestorFlow?

No. OpenInvestorPortal is independent community research built from an open registry. It is not affiliated with, sponsored by or reviewed by Altvia or InvestorFlow. Both entries were last updated on 2026-11-07, and corrections are welcome by pull request or email to hello@openinvestorportal.com.