iLEVEL vs Chronograph: API, MCP and investor access compared
Both are portfolio monitoring platforms used by GPs and LPs, and both have announced MCP servers. This page sets the two registry entries side by side: how investors log in, whether an API or MCP server exists and for whom, what files can be exported, and what the terms say about automation.
Side by side
| Field | CChronograph LP | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | S&P Global Market IntelligenceCountry: US Vendor site | ChronographCountry: US Vendor site |
| Category | Reporting platform | Reporting platform |
| Regions | Global, North America | North America, Global |
| Asset classes | Private equity, Private credit, Real estate, Infrastructure, Fund of funds | Private equity, Venture capital, Private credit, Infrastructure, Fund of funds |
| Web and SSO | AvailableSSO: not recorded | AvailableSSO: not recorded |
| API | Partner onlyStyle: REST Audience: GP, LP and fund administrator Docs: not public | Partner onlyStyle: GraphQL Auth: API key Audience: LP and GP Sandbox: yes Docs: not public |
| Investor-side API | UnknownFrom the registry assessment | DocumentedFrom the registry assessment |
| MCP | Partner onlyMaintainer: vendor Endpoint: not published MCP docs | AvailableMaintainer: vendor Endpoint: https://ai.chronograph.pe/mcpTransport: Streamable HTTP Auth: another auth method MCP docs |
| SFTP | Unknown | Unknown |
| Webhooks | Unknown | Unknown |
| Email notifications | Unknown | Unknown |
| Export formats | None listed | XLSX |
| Capabilities | Documents, Performance, NAV, Fund reports | Documents, Capital calls, Distributions, Capital account statements, Performance, Fund reports, NAV |
| Standards | None listed | None listed |
| Difficulty | 4 / 5Web login only, exports possible | 2 / 5Partner or client API with some friction |
| Automation policy and terms | UnknownTerms URL not recorded | PermittedTerms |
| Known deployments | 0 | 0 |
| Verification | UnverifiedUpdated 2026-11-07 | UnverifiedUpdated 2026-11-07 |
"Not documented" and "Unknown" mean the researchers found no public statement either way, not that the feature is missing.
Key differences
- API. iLEVEL: partner only (REST, for GP, LP and fund administrator users). Chronograph: partner only (GraphQL, API key, for LP and GP users, sandbox).
- MCP server. iLEVEL: partner only (vendor-maintained). Chronograph: available (vendor-maintained, endpoint published, Streamable HTTP, another auth method).
- Investor-side API. The assessment records access for the investor as unknown for iLEVEL and documented for Chronograph.
- Difficulty. The registry rates iLEVEL 4 of 5 (web login only, exports possible) and Chronograph 2 of 5 (partner or client API with some friction). The rating describes how hard programmatic access is for an investor, not product quality.
- Capabilities. Listed for Chronograph only: Capital calls, Distributions and Capital account statements.
- Export formats. Chronograph lists: XLSX; none recorded for iLEVEL.
- Asset classes. Listed for iLEVEL only: Real estate; listed for Chronograph only: Venture capital.
- Automation in the terms. Recorded as unknown for iLEVEL and permitted for Chronograph.
What the entries have in common
- Neither entry documents SFTP, webhooks or email notifications.
- Regions: both list Global and North America.
- Known deployments: none documented for either yet.
Which fits which need
Neither product is right for every team. The statements below are conditional and come straight from the registry fields above.
For investors and LP operations teams
- If your investors or your operations team need documents and data through an API, the registry records the API as partner only (aimed at GP, LP and fund administrator users) for iLEVEL and partner only (aimed at LP and GP users) for Chronograph. Access for the investor itself is recorded as unknown for iLEVEL and documented for Chronograph.
- If you want to reach the data from an AI assistant, the MCP server is partner only for iLEVEL and available for Chronograph. A vendor MCP server can still be limited to the vendor's direct customers, so read the research notes below for who may sign in.
- If you process capital call and distribution notices from your inbox, email notifications are not documented for either.
- If you load files into your own systems, the registry lists no export formats for iLEVEL and XLSX for Chronograph.
- If you plan to automate your own login, automation in the terms is unknown for iLEVEL and permitted for Chronograph. Where it is prohibited or unknown, ask the GP or the vendor for a sanctioned channel first.
For GPs, fund administrators and buyers
- If you need to connect the product to your back office, both entries record API partner only, webhooks not documented and SFTP not documented.
- If the product must carry the core LP reporting items (capital calls, distributions, capital account statements and tax documents), the structured capabilities cover none of the four for iLEVEL and capital calls, distributions and capital account statements for Chronograph.
- If your investors are concentrated in particular markets, the regions recorded are Global and North America for iLEVEL and North America and Global for Chronograph.
- If you manage a specific strategy, the asset classes recorded are private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure and fund of funds for iLEVEL and private equity, venture capital, private credit, infrastructure and fund of funds for Chronograph.
- If you want to see who already runs each product, the registry has no documented deployments for either yet. Operators can add theirs to the registry.
- If your investors will want programmatic access later, the difficulty rating is 4 of 5 for iLEVEL and 2 of 5 for Chronograph, where 1 is a documented self-serve API an investor can use and 5 is web login only with MFA.
For a structured shortlist beyond these two products, see the guide how to choose an investor portal.
What the research says
S&P Global iLEVEL
Assessment. Customer-only REST API and new MCP server for iLEVEL subscribers. LP access via the Prism portal unverified.
Research notes. Many LPs are iLEVEL customers themselves, in which case API and MCP are available under their own contract.
- Web: Portfolio monitoring for GPs and LPs, with the Prism LP portal for sharing documents.
- API: Customer-only REST API used by integration vendors. No public docs.
- MCP: MCP server for iLEVEL customers announced October 2026. No public endpoint or docs.
Sources: press.spglobal.com/2026-10-22-S-P-Global-Expands-AI-Powered-Capabilities-Across-Private-Markets · docs.nexla.com/user-guides/connectors/ilevel_api/overview
Chronograph LP
Assessment. The LP is the customer: GraphQL and REST API with keys and sandbox, Snowflake share, Excel exports, vendor MCP server. Not fully self-serve.
Research notes. Not a GP-to-LP portal: an LP-side monitoring platform where the LP is the customer and GP documents are aggregated on its behalf. Listed because it is the strongest example of investor-side API plus MCP today.
- API: GraphQL and REST APIs, keys for approved developers, sandbox, docs behind client login. Snowflake Secure Data Share.
- MCP: Anthropic-verified connector since November 2025. Tools: run-query, entity-search, commitment-history, investment-metrics, top-exposures.
- Terms: Vendor provides API and MCP for client automation.
Sources: www.chronograph.pe/limited-partners/ · www.chronograph.pe/mcp-connectors/ · claude.com/connectors/chronograph
Frequently asked questions
Does iLEVEL or Chronograph have an API investors can use?
iLEVEL: API partner only (REST, for GP, LP and fund administrator users), investor-side access unknown. Chronograph: API partner only (GraphQL, API key, for LP and GP users, sandbox), investor-side access documented. These are registry records from public sources, so confirm current terms with the vendor.
Do iLEVEL and Chronograph offer an MCP server?
iLEVEL: partner only (vendor-maintained). Chronograph: available (vendor-maintained, endpoint https://ai.chronograph.pe/mcp, Streamable HTTP, another auth method). Vendor MCP servers often serve the vendor's direct customers first, such as GP teams, rather than every investor.
How hard is it to get data out of iLEVEL and Chronograph automatically?
The registry rates iLEVEL 4 of 5 (web login only, exports possible) and Chronograph 2 of 5 (partner or client API with some friction). The scale runs from 1, a documented self-serve API an investor can use, to 5, web login only with MFA.
May I automate my login to iLEVEL or Chronograph?
iLEVEL's position on automated access is not recorded; check the terms before automating. Chronograph's terms permit automated access through the channels the vendor provides.
Is this comparison affiliated with iLEVEL or Chronograph?
No. OpenInvestorPortal is independent community research built from an open registry. It is not affiliated with, sponsored by or reviewed by S&P Global Market Intelligence or Chronograph. Both entries were last updated on 2026-11-07, and corrections are welcome by pull request or email to hello@openinvestorportal.com.